Report  |   April 1999
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Four Vocabulary Tests Administered to Preschool-Age Children
Author Notes
Special Populations / Early Identification & Intervention / Language Disorders
Report   |   April 1999
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Four Vocabulary Tests Administered to Preschool-Age Children
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools April 1999, Vol.30, 196-206. doi:10.1044/0161-1461.3002.196
History: Accepted 14 Jan 1999 , Received 29 Jul 1998
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools April 1999, Vol.30, 196-206. doi:10.1044/0161-1461.3002.196
History: Accepted 14 Jan 1999 , Received 29 Jul 1998

This study examined the empirical evidence for using four vocabulary tests (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III [Dunn & Dunn, 1997], Receptive One-Word Vocabulary Test [Gardner, 1985], Expressive Vocabulary Test [Williams, 1997], Expressive One-Word Vocabulary Test-Revised [Gardner, 1990]) to screen or identify specific language impairment (SLI) in preschool-age children. Tests were administered to 31 4- and 5-year-old children with SLI and 31 age-matched controls with normal language (NL). All children spoke General American English. Despite moderate to strong inter-test correlations, no test was a strong identifier of SLI. The group with SLI scored lower than the NL group on each test; however, the individual scores of children with SLI typically fell within the normal range.

Vocabulary tests are frequently administered to determine whether a child's language skills require further evaluation (screening), as a method of identifying SLI in children, or simply to describe aspects of language functioning. These purposes for administering a vocabulary test require various forms of empirical evidence in support of their use. Our data support construct validity for the four vocabulary tests examined, but do not support their use for identification purposes. Clinicians must apply a degree of sophistication in evaluating the evidence presented for test validity relative to the purposes for which the test will be administered. Unfortunately, although many test manuals offer inter-test correlations or statistically significant group differences as evidence of construct validity, they often omit data that would support common clinical uses, such as screening or identification.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

Extending Use of the NRT to Preschool-Age Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools July 2010, Vol.41, 277-288. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0096)
Seeking a Valid Gold Standard for an Innovative, Dialect-Neutral Language Test
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research March 2014, Vol., 1-14. doi:10.1044/2013_JSLHR-L-12-0126
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Two Tense Measures for Identifying 3-Year-Olds With Language Impairment
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology February 2014, Vol., 1-10. doi:10.1044/2013_AJSLP-13-0007
Executive Functioning Skills in Preschool-Age Children with Cochlear Implants
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research February 2014, Vol., No Pagination Specified. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0054
Reaching the Neediest Preschoolers
The ASHA Leader February 2014, Vol.19, 42-48. doi:10.1044/leader.FTR1.19022014.42